home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!hectortd.demon.co.uk
- From: Paul Copsey <paul@hectortd.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 96 14:22:07 GMT
- Organization: E. Scrooge's Humbug Factory
- Message-ID: <9602031422.AA003u7@hectortd.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4et222$r4g@infa.central.susx.ac.uk> <1219.6606T1078T2951@crl.com>
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: hectortd.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
- X-Mail2News-Path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!hectortd.demon.co.uk
-
- Joseph Waldvogel (joewald@crl.com) wrote:
- >
- > >Steve Powell posted the following:
- >
- > >the A620 would make the A600 4x faster than a standard A1200.
- >
- > 4x faster? I don't think so! They both would have 020 processors, but the A600
- > is just a 16-bit system, the A1200 is a 32-bit system. If your talking about
- > also adding Fast Ram to that A620 board, well hell then you better add Ram to
- > that A1200 to be fair, which will make the A1200 Faster still. The A600 was a
-
- The 620 is an 020 @28MHz though, so it wins by horespower over a 14MHz
- 1200.
-
- Paul
-
- --
- "They're merely expressing their feelings for me."
- 'I can do that." [Timov slaps Londo]
- -- Londo and Timov, "Soul Mates"
-